THAT’S CHEATING!!!
Plagiarism
is an ongoing concern in education. It brings into question the motives,
intentions, and values of students who cheat. It also creates concern about how
much do educators need to worry about it and what can be done. Some research
says about 13% of students plagiarize (Jocoy and DiBiase, 2006). With the
steadily increasing number of online students, even if the percentage doesn’t change,
the numbers of cheaters is steadily increasing. What can be done?
The very
technology that makes researching and using information simple and limitless is
the same technology which has created plagiarism detection devices. Concerned
educators can insert phrases into almost any search engine and discover if the
phrase is original and where it came from if it isn’t. Software such as EVE
(Essay Verification Engine) and Turnitin.com check assignments automatically
against a database with millions of entries and have a very high detection
rate. These detection devices have been in use for several years, and yet
plagiarism continues.
My
experiences as an undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate student have included
the use of Turnitin for many years. How hard is it to write a paper and use
citations in APA form? If a student doesn’t know how to format in APA (and by
graduate school they certainly should), they can use writing formatting
software such as PERRLA (http://www.perrla.com/) to format papers for them. I
just don’t understand why someone would go to the trouble of researching a topic,
then finding a quote, and copying and pasting it without taking another minute
to cite it properly. I suppose it might be considered academic laziness.
It is my
opinion that educators should continue to uphold expectations of academic
excellence in accordance with established guidelines (like MLA or APA).
Students should be made aware of expectations and academic guidelines, as well
as school policy regarding plagiarism. A properly formatted reference section
should maintain an important place in a grading rubric. Students who plagiarize
should be penalized accordingly. However, the remainder of the paper or
assignment should still be considered for credit. To do this, educators can
modify the nature of the assignment to discourage plagiarism. By utilizing personal
experiences and examples, as well as requiring personal application of
concepts, educators can assess the level of learner understanding of core
concepts, the ability to think critically, and solve problems. A properly
designed assignment will not benefit from plagiarism; in fact it may demonstrate
learner weaknesses rather than assets.
In their
video “Plagiarism and Cheating”, Pratt and Palloff (2012) discuss designing
assignments and assessments in such a way as to discourage, or at least
discount, plagiarism. I found this approach to be refreshing and extraordinary.
Most of academia decries cheating, while these educators were actually inviting
it! I am in complete agreement with this approach. Though I believe educators
still have the duty to encourage academic writing and skills, they also have
the duty to promote skills which are applicable in a real world environment.
Many adult learners may have no interest in scholarly thinking and writing, but
they have returned to school to acquire skills which will benefit them in their
lives and careers. Creating assignments and assessments which have value
whether there is “cheating” or not is an effort to advance education in spite
of the age old issue of cheating.
In my own
experience I have taken distance learning exams by a proctor and for online
courses exams allowing open books and sources. The online exams were much more
comprehensive and demanding. The ability to “cheat” was acknowledged; however
using notes, texts, and Internet sources was more of an impediment than a
benefit. A comprehensive question with a time limit for response requires a
solid understanding of the topic at hand and the ability to express that
understanding clearly.
It is
these types of assignments and assessments I aspire to apply to online
education for adults. While acknowledging academic criteria and encouraging its
use through state of the art technology (like formatting software and detection
software), I hope to create assignments where plagiarism and cheating are not
helpful. Instead of cheating I hope to foster creativity, understanding, and a
successful learning experience.
References:
Jocoy, C., & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners
online: A case study in detection and remediation. International Review of
Research in Open & Distance Learning, 7(1), 1–15. Retrieved 12-07-13
from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/242/495
Pratt and Palloff 2012 Plagiarism and cheating. Laureate Education, Inc Retrieved 12-07-13
from: http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/Walden/EDUC/6179/06/downloads/WAL_EDUC6179_06_A_EN.pdf
PERRLA Retrieved 12-07-13
from: http://www.perrla.com/